Why do the Latter-day Saints not wear or use the cross

FAIR Answers—back to home page


Why do the Latter-day Saints not wear or use the cross?

One scholar noted, "During the first Christian centuries, the cross was a thing accursed. No one professed allegiance to Christ by wearing a cross."[1] After the 4th century, the cross slowly became accepted in the Catholic tradition.

In the United States of America, before the mid-19th century, the cross was seen as a uniquely Catholic symbol. As a result, Protestants were adamantly opposed to using the cross in their worship or on their buildings. Eventually, Protestants began adopting the cross as a church symbol. By the late 19th century, the cross had become firmly entrenched as a symbol of Christianity generally, not just Catholicism.[2]

Because The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was founded in the early- to mid-19th century, most converts came from religious traditions that did not use the cross. As the century wore on, Protestants in the eastern United States began to use the cross more prominently. The Latter-day Saints had been driven out of the United States, and so were not connected to this cultural current. However, the Saints did not reject the cross altogether.

In 1957, Church President David O. McKay counselled against using crosses on jewellery because he viewed it as "a Catholic form of worship."[3] In 1975, then-Elder Gordon B. Hinckley explained that he viewed "the cross [as] the symbol of the dying Christ, while our message is a declaration of the living Christ."[4]

Even though many Protestants view the empty cross as a symbol of the living Christ, for many Latter-day Saints the cross is focused on the death of Jesus Christ instead of His living reality.[5] Hence the recent adoption of Thorvaldsen's statue Christus as the centerpiece in the Church symbol.[6]

Church leaders have taught that the best symbol of our belief in Christ is following His example in how we live. Elder Marvin J. Ashton of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles taught: "From Matthew 16꞉24-25: 'Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.' We in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in response to these questions, try to teach our people to carry their crosses rather than display or wear them."[7] This counsel echoes that of then-Elder Gordon B. Hinckley, who taught that "the lives of our people must become the only meaningful expression of our faith and, in fact, therefore, the symbol of our worship."[8]

Elder Jeffrey R. Holland reiterated this principle:

These considerations—especially the latter—bring me to what may be the most important of all scriptural references to the cross. It has nothing to do with pendants or jewellery, with steeples or signposts. It has to do, rather, with the rock-ribbed integrity and stiff moral backbone that Christians should bring to the call Jesus has given to every one of His disciples. In every land and age, He has said to us all, “If any man [or woman] will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.”[9]

In summary, in the 21st century the cross reflects the culture and tradition of Christianity generally, and there is nothing doctrinal about using or avoiding the cross as a decorative symbol. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ respect other Christian groups that use the cross in that way.

Most importantly, members of the Church acknowledge the inestimable sacrifice of Jesus upon the cross, for as he said, "My Father sent me that I might be lifted up upon the cross; and after that I had been lifted up upon the cross, that I might draw all men unto me."[10]


Notes

  1. Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, "'Even death on a cross': Crucifixion in the Pauline letters," in The Cross in Christian Tradition: From Paul to Bonaventure, Elizabeth Dreyer, ed. (Paulist Press, 2000), 21.
  2. Ryan K. Smith, "The Cross: Church Symbol and Contest in Nineteenth-Century America," Church History, 70:4 (December 2001), 705-734.
  3. Gregory L. Prince, David O. McKay and the Rise of Modern Mormonism, 121.
  4. Gordon B. Hinckley, "The Symbol of Christ," April 1975 general conference.
  5. "Early and traditional Christian figures such as Martin Luther’s associate Andreas Karlstadt (1486–1541) were arguing by the late Middle Ages that 'the crucifix [on its own] depicted only Christ’s human suffering and neglected to display his resurrection and redemptive [powers]' (in John Hilton III, Considering the Cross: How Calvary Connects Us with Christ [2021], 17)." Jeffrey R. Holland, "Lifted Up upon the Cross," October 2022 general conference.
  6. See Russell M. Nelson, "Opening the Heavens for Help," April 2020 general conference.
  7. Marvin J. Ashton, "Carry Your Cross," address given at Brigham Young University, 3 May 1987.
  8. Hinckley, "The Symbol of Christ."
  9. Holland, "Lifted Up upon the Cross."
  10. 3 Nephi 27꞉14.


Source(s) of the criticism:
Critical sources

Notes