Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/Deciding"

m (GLSBot: Adding footers to all articles)
Line 16: Line 16:
 
One of the reasons I compiled these references is that the Bible tests for prophets should be high on the list of problems that are most significant to have solved. They provide fundamental generalizations, define practical applications, and generate research puzzles.
 
One of the reasons I compiled these references is that the Bible tests for prophets should be high on the list of problems that are most significant to have solved. They provide fundamental generalizations, define practical applications, and generate research puzzles.
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
[[fr:Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/Deciding]]
 

Revision as of 14:57, 5 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]

Deciding “Which Problems are more significant to have solved?”

While there are no rules for deciding even which “problems are more significant to have solved,” Kuhn often saw these issues as prominent:

  • Issues for Fundamental Generalizations (Kuhn, 79)
  • Anomaly Related to Specific Practical Applications (Kuhn, 82)
  • Research Puzzles That Currently Resist Solution (Kuhn, 82)

One of the reasons I compiled these references is that the Bible tests for prophets should be high on the list of problems that are most significant to have solved. They provide fundamental generalizations, define practical applications, and generate research puzzles.