FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Does FairMormon use the internet to teach a "bizarre version" of Mormonism riddled with logical fallacies?"
(→Question: Does FairMormon use the internet to teach a "bizarre version" of Mormonism riddled with logical fallacies?) |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[Category:Letter to a CES Director]] |
| + | |||
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Utiliza FairMormon internet para enseñar una "versión bizarra" del mormonismo plagada de falacias lógicas?]] | [[es:Pregunta: ¿Utiliza FairMormon internet para enseñar una "versión bizarra" del mormonismo plagada de falacias lógicas?]] | ||
[[pt:Pergunta: Utiliza a FairMormon a Internet para ensinar uma "versão bizarra" do Mormonismo, equipada de falácias lógicas?]] | [[pt:Pergunta: Utiliza a FairMormon a Internet para ensinar uma "versão bizarra" do Mormonismo, equipada de falácias lógicas?]] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 15:29, 5 June 2017
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Question: Does FairMormon use the internet to teach a "bizarre version" of Mormonism riddled with logical fallacies?
FairMormon responds to every question by locating and quoting the Church response to any particular subject
In all of the FairMormon Answers responses, we always first quote the relevant position of the Church, unless the Church holds no official position on it. The remainder of the answer will always be based around what the Church teaches on the subject.
FairMormon does not "magnify, exaggerate" or "invent shortcomings of early Church leaders." Claiming that prophets are human beings and capable of error is not a "shortcoming." Ironically, this is what the Church itself has claimed.
Finally, read the author's statement carefully: He claims that FairMormon provides "many ridiculous answers with logical fallacies and omissions." The author, ironically, commits the logical fallacy of "Appeal to Ridicule," which, according to Wikipedia,
Appeal to ridicule....is an informal fallacy which presents an opponent's argument as absurd, ridiculous, or in any way humorous, to the specific end of a foregone conclusion that the argument lacks any substance which would merit consideration. Wikipedia entry
Notes