Difference between revisions of "Template:Critical sources box:The Bible/Open canon vs. closed canon/CriticalSources"

Line 5: Line 5:
 
*Luke P. Wilson, “Lost Books & Latter-Day Revelation:  A Response to Mormon Views of the New Testament Canon,” ''Christian Research Journal'' (Fall 1996): 27–33.
 
*Luke P. Wilson, “Lost Books & Latter-Day Revelation:  A Response to Mormon Views of the New Testament Canon,” ''Christian Research Journal'' (Fall 1996): 27–33.
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 
[[fr:Latter-day Saint scripture/Open canon vs. closed canon/CriticalSources]]
 

Revision as of 16:44, 5 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Source(s) of the criticism

  • Bill McKeever and Eric Johnson, Mormonism 101. Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 2000), Chapter 7. ( Index of claims )
  • La Roy Sunderland, “Mormonism,” Zion’s Watchman (New York) 3, no. 6 (10 February 1838): 22off-site
  • Luke P. Wilson, “Lost Books & Latter-Day Revelation: A Response to Mormon Views of the New Testament Canon,” Christian Research Journal (Fall 1996): 27–33.