Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{FairMormon}}  
 
{{BookHeader
 
{{BookHeader
 
|title=[[../../]]
 
|title=[[../../]]
Line 21: Line 21:
 
*[[/Critical Realism|Ian Barbour’s Critical Realism]]
 
*[[/Critical Realism|Ian Barbour’s Critical Realism]]
 
*[[/Values Applied|Values Applied in Paradigm Debate]]
 
*[[/Values Applied|Values Applied in Paradigm Debate]]
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 

Revision as of 17:10, 8 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]

A Brief Guide to Paradigm Debate in Religious Circles

One of the things that my original study of the Bible tests, recommendations, and critical practice did was to prepare me to appreciate the importance of Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, and later to Ian Barbour’s important work comparing Kuhn’s model to religious debates. Here, I want to briefly survey some important issues, before looking at a specific critical response to Joseph Smith.