Difference between revisions of "Biblical Keys for Discerning True and False Prophets/Considering Joseph Smith/Paradigm debate/Critical Realism"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{FairMormon}}  
 
{{BookHeader
 
{{BookHeader
 
|title=[[../../../]]
 
|title=[[../../../]]
Line 14: Line 14:
 
*“There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15)
 
*“There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15)
 
I suggest that the Bible keys collected here can provide a beginning core of overlap to which people can retreat in discussing prophets. For those who may not accept the authority of the Bible, I have suggested other places of common ground to which we can retreat for which I have links in the Author’s Note.
 
I suggest that the Bible keys collected here can provide a beginning core of overlap to which people can retreat in discussing prophets. For those who may not accept the authority of the Bible, I have suggested other places of common ground to which we can retreat for which I have links in the Author’s Note.
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
 

Revision as of 17:11, 8 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

[[{{{L}}}|{{{H}}}]]

Ian Barbour’s Critical Realism

  • Theory influences observation with the result that all data are to some degree theory-laden. Although proponents of rival theories inevitably talk through each other to a degree, adherents “of rival theories can seek a common core of overlap . . . to which both can retreat.”
  • “Comprehensive theories are indeed resistant to falsification, but observation does exert some control over theory; an accumulation of anomalies cannot be ignored indefinitely.”
  • “There are no rules for choice between paradigms but there are criteria of assessment independent of particular paradigms.” (Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms, 113-15)

I suggest that the Bible keys collected here can provide a beginning core of overlap to which people can retreat in discussing prophets. For those who may not accept the authority of the Bible, I have suggested other places of common ground to which we can retreat for which I have links in the Author’s Note.