Book of Mormon/Evidences/Hebraisms/Chiasmus/CriticalSources

< Book of Mormon‎ | Evidences‎ | Hebraisms‎ | Chiasmus

Revision as of 13:54, 15 June 2011 by GregSmith (talk | contribs) (Created page with "==={{Criticism source label English}}=== *{{Dialogue|author=Brent Lee Metcalfe|article=Apologetic and Critical Assumptions about Book of Mormon Historicity|vol=26|num=3|date=Fall...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Source(s) of the criticism

  • Brent Lee Metcalfe, "Apologetic and Critical Assumptions about Book of Mormon Historicity," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 26 no. 3 (Fall 1993), 162–171.
  • Jerald and Sandra Tanner, Salt Lake City Messenger, no. 72 (1989).
  • Sandra Tanner, “Chiasmus and the Book of Mormon,” Utah Lighthouse Ministry (2003).
  • Daniel A. Vogel, “The Use and Abuse of Chiasmus in Book of Mormon Studies,” SL01374, presented at Sunstone Theological Symposium, Salt Lake City, Utah (2001).
  • Earl Wunderli, "Critique of Alma 36 as an Extended Chiasm," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 38 no. 4 (Winter 2005), 97–110.