Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Assumptions and presumptions"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H1 +|H))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{FairMormon}}  
 
{{FairMormon}}  
 
{{H1
 
{{H1
|L={{check}}
+
|L=Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy/Assumptions and presumptions
 
|H=''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions
 
|H=''Nauvoo Polygamy'': Assumptions and presumptions
 
|S=
 
|S=

Revision as of 08:56, 30 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Nauvoo Polygamy: Assumptions and presumptions



A FAIR Analysis of: Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Nauvoo Polygamy, a work by author: George D. Smith

Familiar anti-Mormon arguments

Joseph's guilt is always assumed

Joseph is simply assumed to be guilty of any offense.

  • He is even "haunted by the suspicion, which followed him from place to place, that he crossed moral boundaries in his friendship with other women." (p. 28)
  • In Illinois Joseph "was still hunted by law officials for old offenses." (p. 34)
  • The author assumes that Joseph "went about courting" various women, despite the total lack of evidence that any "courtships" occurred. (p. 54)