Difference between revisions of "Doctrine and Covenants/Lectures on Faith"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H1 +|H))
(content consolidation)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}}
+
#REDIRECT[[Lectures on Faith]]
<onlyinclude>
 
{{H1
 
|L=Doctrine and Covenants/Lectures on Faith
 
|H=Lectures on Faith
 
|S=
 
|L1=Lecture of Faith 5 teaches the Father is "a personage of spirit"
 
|L2=Removal of the Lectures on Faith from the Doctrine and Covenants
 
|L3=Noel B. Reynolds, "The Authorship Debate concerning Lectures on Faith: Exhumation and Reburial"
 
}}
 
{{:Mormonism and the nature of God/God is a Spirit/Lecture of Faith 5 teaches the Father is "a personage of spirit"}}
 
{{:Doctrine and Covenants/Lectures on Faith/Removed}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
 
 
{{MaxwellInstituteBar
 
|link=http://publications.maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/fullscreen/?pub=1092&index=15
 
|title=The Authorship Debate concerning ''Lectures on Faith'': Exhumation and Reburial
 
|author=Noel B. Reynolds
 
|publication=The Disciple as Witness
 
|date=2000
 
|summary=The issue that continues to provoke the most interest relative to the Lectures on Faith is their authorship. Who wrote them? The available evidence tends to undermine the view that Joseph Smith was primarily responsible for them. It is unfortunate that some feel so strongly about maintaining Joseph Smith's authorship or responsibility for these lectures. This makes it difficult for other faithful Latter-day Saints to assess the evidence critically, and it also plays into the hands of critics of the church and Joseph Smith. Critics find much in the lectures and in the church's eventual exclusion of them from the scriptural canon with which to embarrass faithful Mormons.9 Insisting that Joseph was responsible for the lectures only makes the critics' task easier. For example, Lecture 5 provides Dan Vogel with his principal evidence for an evolving Mormon concept of God that in 1835 reflected "Sidney Rigdon's Primitivistic background and not the orthodox LDS view of three distinct personages in the godhead."
 
<br>
 
Opinions on the authorship and status of the lectures in Latter-day Saint literature have varied widely among both scholars and church authorities. Elders Bruce R. McConkie and Joseph Fielding Smith both saw Joseph Smith as a principal author of the lectures and believed he had approved them in full, having revised and prepared them for publication.11 However, that view does not appear to have been generally shared by the church leadership that discontinued official publication of the seven lectures in 1921, allowed the copyright to lapse, and explicitly reiterated that these lectures were not scripture but merely "helps."12 The "Explanatory Introductions" of subsequent editions have included such explanations as this one from page v of the 1966 edition:
 
<blockquote>
 
    Certain lessons, entitled "Lectures on Faith," which were bound in with the Doctrine and Covenants in some of its former issues, are not included in this edition. These lessons were prepared for use in the School of the Elders, conducted in Kirtland, Ohio, during the winter of 1834–1835; but they were never presented to nor accepted by the Church as being otherwise than theological lectures or lessons.
 
</blockquote>
 
At least some of the presiding brethren possibly held the view published later by Elder John A. Widtsoe, who believed they were "written by Sidney Rigdon and others."13 Three independent authorship studies conducted in recent decades and using different reputable techniques all conclude that Sidney Rigdon was the primary author of the lectures. Based on these studies, not a single lecture can conclusively be attributed to Joseph Smith.
 
}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
 
 
[[de:Lehre und Bündnisse/Vorlesungen über Glauben]]
 
[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Discursos sobre la Fe]]
 
[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Palestras sobre Fé]]
 

Latest revision as of 15:26, 1 December 2023

Redirect to: