Difference between revisions of "Latter-day Saints and divorce in the nineteenth century"

Line 9: Line 9:
 
|L3=Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio
 
|L3=Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio
 
}}
 
}}
 +
</onlyinclude>
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/Divorce in the 19th century}}
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/Divorce in the 19th century}}
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/Remarrying without civil divorce}}
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/Remarrying without civil divorce}}
 
{{:Polygamy book/Illegal marriages in Ohio}}
 
{{:Polygamy book/Illegal marriages in Ohio}}
</onlyinclude>
+
 
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 14:31, 21 April 2019

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Mormonism and divorce in the nineteenth century


Jump to Subtopic:


Divorce among Mormons in the 19th century

Summary: Some critics like to emphasize that some LDS members did not receive civil divorces before remarrying—either monogamously or polygamously. They either state or imply that this shows the Saints' cavalier attitude toward the law.


Jump to Subtopic:

  1. REDIRECTPlural marriage/Divorce in the 19th century

Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio

Summary: Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.


Jump to Subtopic:


Notes