View source for Matthews: "To regard the New Translation...as a product of divine inspiration given to Joseph Smith does not necessarily assume that it be a restoration of the original Bible text"

{{FairMormon}}
<onlyinclude>
==Matthews: "To regard the New Translation...as a product of divine inspiration given to Joseph Smith does not necessarily assume that it be a restoration of the original Bible text"==

In describing the nature of the Joseph Smith Translation (JST), the leading expert, Robert J. Matthews, said:
<blockquote>
To regard the New Translation [i.e. JST] as a product of divine inspiration given to Joseph Smith does not necessarily assume that it be a restoration of the original Bible text. It seems probable that the New Translation could be many things. For example, the nature of the work may fall into at least four categories: 
#Portions may amount to restorations of content material once written by the biblical authors but since deleted from the Bible. 
#Portions may consist of a record of actual historical events that were not recorded, or were recorded but never included in the biblical collection 
#Portions may consist of inspired commentary by the Prophet Joseph Smith, enlarged, elaborated, and even adapted to a latter-day situation. This may be similar to what Nephi meant by "Likening" the scriptures to himself and his people in their particular circumstance. (See 1 Nephi 19:23-24; 2 Nephi 11:8). 
#Some items may be a harmonization of doctrinal concepts that were revealed to the Prophet Joseph Smith independently of his translation of the Bible, but by means of which he was able to discover that a biblical passage was inaccurate. 

The most fundamental question seems to be whether or not one is disposed to accept the New Translation as a divinely inspired document.<ref>Robert J. Matthews, ''"A Plainer Translation": Joseph Smith's Translation of the Bible: A History and Commentary'' (Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 1985), 253.</ref>
</blockquote>

The same author later observed:

<blockquote>
It would be informative to consider various meanings of the word translate. The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) gives these definitions: "To turn from one language into another retaining the sense"; also, "To express in other words, to paraphrase." It gives another meaning as, "To interpret, explain, expound the significance of." Other dictionaries give approximately the same definitions as the OED. Although we generally think of translation as having to do with changing a word text from one language to another, that is not the only usage of the word. Translate equally means to express an idea or statement in other words, even in the same language. If people are unfamiliar with certain terminology in their own tongue, they will need an explanation. The explanation may be longer than the original, yet the original had all the meaning, either stated or implied. In common everyday discourse, when we hear something stated ambiguously or in highly technical terms, we ask the speaker to translate it for us. It is not expected that the response must come in another language, but only that the first statement be made clear. The speaker's new statement is a form of translation because it follows the basic purpose and intent of the word translation, which is to render something in understandable form…Every translation is an interpretation—a version. The translation of language cannot be a mechanical operation … Translation is a cognitive and functional process because there is not one word in every language to match with exact words in every other language. Gender, case, tense, terminology, idiom, word order, obsolete and archaic words, and shades of meaning—all make translation an interpretive process.<ref>Robert J. Matthews, "Joseph Smith as Translator," in ''Joseph Smith, The Prophet, The Man'', edited by Susan Easton Black and Charles D. Tate, Jr. (Provo: Religious Studies Center, 1993), 80, 84.</ref>
</blockquote>
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}

[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:MormonThink]]

[[de:Quelle:Matthews:Joseph Smith's Translation of the Bible:dass es eine Wiederherstellung der ursprünglichen Bibeltexte ist]]
[[pt:Fonte:Matthews:a Nova Tradução...não necessariamente significa que se trate de uma restauração do texto da Bíblia original]]