Latter-day Saints and divorce in the nineteenth century

Revision as of 14:31, 21 April 2019 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs)

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Mormonism and divorce in the nineteenth century


Jump to Subtopic:


Divorce among Mormons in the 19th century

Summary: Some critics like to emphasize that some LDS members did not receive civil divorces before remarrying—either monogamously or polygamously. They either state or imply that this shows the Saints' cavalier attitude toward the law.


Jump to Subtopic:


Some 19th century Mormons did not receive civil divorces before remarrying


Jump to Subtopic:


[[../Illegal marriages in Ohio|Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio]]

Summary: Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.


Jump to Subtopic:

  • [[../Illegal marriages in Ohio#Question: Did Joseph Smith violate marriage laws in Ohio by performing marriages?|Question: Did Joseph Smith violate marriage laws in Ohio by performing marriages?]]
  • [[../Illegal marriages in Ohio#Question: When Joseph Smith performed the marriage of Newel Knight and Lydia Bailey, were they guilty of bigamy since Lydia had not been formally divorced from her previous husband?|Question: When Joseph Smith performed the marriage of Newel Knight and Lydia Bailey, were they guilty of bigamy since Lydia had not been formally divorced from her previous husband?]]


Notes