Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and doctrine/Doctrine of the past"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H1 +|H))
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{H1
 
{{H1
 
|L=Mormonism and doctrine/Doctrine of the past
 
|L=Mormonism and doctrine/Doctrine of the past
|H1=Mormon doctrine of the past
+
|H=Mormon doctrine of the past
 
|S=
 
|S=
 
|L1=Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"
 
|L1=Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"

Revision as of 15:57, 26 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page


Mormon doctrine of the past


Jump to Subtopic:

Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"

Summary: Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.


Jump to Subtopic:


The Law of Adoption: The sealing of men and women as children to prominent Latter-day Saint leaders

Summary: Critics point to the early practice of sealing men and women as children to prominent LDS leaders as an example of changes in LDS belief.


Jump to Subtopic: