FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Plural marriage and the law"
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|H2 +|H)) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{H2 | {{H2 | ||
|L=Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal | |L=Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal | ||
| − | | | + | |H=Legality of polygamy |
|S= | |S= | ||
|L1=Question: Was polygamy illegal? | |L1=Question: Was polygamy illegal? | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 26 June 2017
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Legality of polygamy
Jump to details:
- Question: Was polygamy illegal?
- Was the practice of polygamy against the law in Illinois in the 1840s?
- Gregory L. Smith, M.D., "Polygamy, Prophets, and Prevarication: Frequently and Rarely Asked Questions about the Initiation, Practice, and Cessation of Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"
A question has many times been asked of the Church and of its individual members, to this effect: In the case of a conflict between the requirements made by the revealed word of God, and those imposed by the secular law, which of these authorities would the members of the Church be bound to obey?…Pending the overruling by Providence in favor of religious liberty, it is the duty of the saints to submit themselves to the laws of their country.
James E. Talmage, The Articles of Faith (Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book Company, 1981[1899]),382–383.
- REDIRECTPlural marriage and the law
- REDIRECT Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Illegal in Nauvoo
Gregory L. Smith, M.D., "Polygamy, Prophets, and Prevarication: Frequently and Rarely Asked Questions about the Initiation, Practice, and Cessation of Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints"
Gregory L. Smith, M.D., FairMormon Papers, (2005)Critics charge that the Church and its members participated in polygamy in violation of both state and federal laws. It is therefore argued that the Church abandoned its commitment to “obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.”8 Critics, however, make such arguments without a full understanding of the legal considerations of the day and without understanding how civil disobedience plays into the picture.
Click here to view the complete article
Notes