Difference between revisions of "Question: Could the Book of Mormon be a clumsy, amateurish forgery?"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles(.*)}} +))
Line 14: Line 14:
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
  
{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
+
 
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->

Revision as of 22:54, 8 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Question: Could the Book of Mormon be a clumsy, amateurish forgery?

The obvious complexity, textual depth, and beauty of the Book of Mormon has led most modern critics to abandon the claim that it is simply a clumsy or amateurish pastiche

Early critics of Mormonism charged that even a cursory examination reveals the Book of Mormon to be a clumsy, amateurish forgery.

The obvious complexity, textual depth, and beauty of the Book of Mormon has led most modern critics to abandon the claim that it is simply a clumsy or amateurish pastiche. This has led later critics to insist that Joseph was either much more gifted than his contemporaries believed him to be, or to attribute the Book of Mormon to another author altogether.


To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

Notes