Difference between revisions of "Question: Have Mormon apologists ignored aspects of Quetzalcoatl which are inconsistent with Jesus Christ?"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source\n\|title(.*)\n}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (top: Bot replace {{FairMormon}} with {{Main Page}} and remove extra lines around {{Header}})
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}}
+
{{Main Page}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
==Question: Have Mormon apologists ignored aspects of Quetzalcoatl which are inconsistent with Jesus Christ?==
 
==Question: Have Mormon apologists ignored aspects of Quetzalcoatl which are inconsistent with Jesus Christ?==
Line 19: Line 19:
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
[[Category:Difficult Questions for Mormons]]
 
[[Category:Difficult Questions for Mormons]]
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 15:21, 13 April 2024

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Question: Have Mormon apologists ignored aspects of Quetzalcoatl which are inconsistent with Jesus Christ?

Those who have seen Quetzalcoatl as evidence for Christ's visit to the Americas generally saw the Quetzalcoatl legend as an apostate remnant of the truth

Critic Richard Abanes claims that the similarities in the comparison of Quetzalcoatl with Jesus Christ are "minor," while continuing on to note that "what LDS apologists tend to not mention are a few additional aspects of Quetzalcoatl, none of which seem very consistent with Jesus Christ." The following aspects of the Quetzalcoatl legend are those that some claim that are "deemphasized" by LDS apologists:

  • Snake worship
  • Human sacrifice made to Quetzalcoatl
  • Quetzalcoatl's twin brother Xolotl

Have "LDS apologists" (meaning, in this case, any LDS scholar) ignored or deemphasized aspects of the Quetzalcoatl legend?

Those (e.g., Milton R. Hunter) who have seen Quetzalcoatl as evidence for Christ's visit to the Americas generally saw the Quetzalcoatl legend as an apostate remnant of the truth. Thus, they saw some parallels which they felt applied to Jesus, while recognizing that fifteen hundred years of apostasy and corruption led to other elements being "grafted on" or altered.

While a legitimate perspective, this approach has the disadvantage of seeing parallels and ignoring contradictory aspects.


Notes