View source for Question: If a doctrine is repudiated, does that mean that it was false when it was being taught?

{{Main Page}}
<onlyinclude>
==Question: If a doctrine is repudiated, does that mean that it was false when it was being taught?==
===Some ideas that were once taught are now considered false===

Several teachings that were once considered doctrinal in the 19th-century Church have been repudiated by the modern Church. Among these are polygamy, the "Adam-God theory," the priesthood ban on members of African descent, and "blood atonement."

In the case of the "Adam-God theory," there was disagreement within the Church leadership regarding whether or not the teaching was true. The teaching was specifically repudiated by the Church.

===Some ideas that were taught are considered to be true, but no longer authorized===

On the other hand, the practice of polygamy was institutionalized within the Church and was only stopped when it became necessary in order for the Church to progress. Although the Church repudiates the practice of polygamy today, it does not repudiate the practice of polygamy among early Church members in the 19th-century. In other words, it does not consider the doctrine of polygamy to be false for the time - it would only consider it to be "false," in a sense, for the present day among living members of the Church. 
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:MormonThink]]

[[es:Pregunta: Si se repudió una doctrina, ¿significa eso que era falsa cuando se está enseñando?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Se uma doutrina é rejeitada, isso significa que ela seria falsa quando era ensinada?]]
[[Category:Questions]]