View source for Question: Should the restoration of Book of Abraham Facsimile 1 include a phallus?

{{FairMormon}}
<onlyinclude>
==Question: Should the restoration of Facsimile 1 include a phallus?==
===The Larson restoration adds a phallus on the reclining figure, something that is never seen on a clothed Osiris figure===

The Larson restoration adds a phallus on the reclining figure, something that is never seen on a clothed Osiris figure. 
*The assumption appears to be that the hash marks on the legs represent breeches. One can also observe this assumption on the Hedlock restoration contained in the Book of Abraham. However, an examination of the original papyrus shows that the legs of the figure were drawn, and that a wraparound Egyptian kilt was then drawn over them. The clothing is not a pair of breeches. This detail is not even in the Larson image, as the two lines distinguishing the legs and the kilt are merged into a single, fat line.
*It can be seen in the closeup detail that the hash lines of the kilt extend beyond the lines of the leg, intersecting the outer line of the kilt.
*It can also be seen that the kilt is curved, whereas the legs are straight.
*The Larson restoration adds a phallus (which we have chosen to obscure) in the location of the figure's navel, based upon the location of the intersection of the legs and an estimate of where the top of the kilt would appear.
[[File:Larson.restoration.comparison.to.original.skirt.detail.jpg|center|1000px]]
</onlyinclude>
{{endnotes sources}}
[[Category:Becoming Gods]]
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
[[Category:One Nation Under Gods]]

[[es:Pregunta: En caso de que la restauración de Facsímil 1 incluirá un falo?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Caso a restauração da Fac-símile 1 incluem um falo?]]