Difference between revisions of "Question: What are the "curse of Cain" and the "curse of Ham"?"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source\n\|title=(.*)\n\|category=(.*)\n}} +{{FairMormon}}))
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Qué son la "maldición de Caín" y la "maldición de Cam"?]]
 +
[[pt:Pergunta: Quais são a "maldição de Caim" e da "maldição de Cam"?]]
 +
 
[[Category:MormonThink]]
 
[[Category:MormonThink]]
 
[[Category:One Nation Under Gods]]
 
[[Category:One Nation Under Gods]]
 
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]
 
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]
 
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]]
 
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Quais são a "maldição de Caim" e da "maldição de Cam"?]]
 

Revision as of 22:31, 29 November 2018

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Question: What are the "curse of Cain" and the "curse of Ham"?

There is a distinction between the “curse” and the “mark” of Cain

The "curse of Cain" resulted in Cain being cut off from the presence of the Lord. The Genesis and Moses accounts both attest to this. The Book of Mormon teaches this principle in general when it speaks about those who keep the commandments will prosper in the land, while those who don't will be cut off from the presence off the Lord. This type of curse was applied to the Lamanites when they rejected the teachings of the prophets.

The exact nature of the "mark" of Cain, on the other hand, is unknown. The scriptures don't say specifically what it was, except that it was for Cain's protection, so that those finding him wouldn't slay him. Many people, both in an out of the Church, have assumed that the mark and the curse are the same thing.


Notes