Difference between revisions of "Question: Why did Joseph keep the doctrine of plural marriage private?"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source\n\|title=(.*)\n\|category=(.*)\n}} +{{FairMormon}}))
m (The Saints would have suffered negative consequences: bot - tag "Questions")
Line 23: Line 23:
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué José a mantener la doctrina del matrimonio plural privado?]]
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué José a mantener la doctrina del matrimonio plural privado?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph manteve reservada a doutrina do casamento plural?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph manteve reservada a doutrina do casamento plural?]]
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Revision as of 21:50, 12 April 2024

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Question: Why did Joseph keep the doctrine of plural marriage private?

The Saints would have suffered negative consequences

Keeping the doctrine private was also necessary because the enemies of the Church would have used it as another justification for their assault on the Saints. Orson Hyde looked back on the Nauvoo days and indicated what the consequences of disclosure would have been:

In olden times they might have passed through the same circumstances as some of the Latter-day Saints had to in Illinois. What would it have done for us, if they had known that many of us had more than one wife when we lived in Illinois? They would have broken us up, doubtless, worse than they did.[1]

It is thus important to realize that the public preaching of polygamy—or announcing it to the general Church membership, thereby informing the public by proxy—was simply not a feasible plan.


Notes

  1. Orson Hyde, "The Marriage Relations," (6 October 1854) Journal of Discourses 2:75-75.