Difference between revisions of "Resurrection/As a Priesthood Ordinance/CriticalSources"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 1...)
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles FAIR copyright}} +{{FairMormon}}))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}   
+
{{FairMormon}}   
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
==={{Criticism source label English}}===
 
==={{Criticism source label English}}===

Revision as of 14:52, 8 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Source(s) of the criticism

During a lecture at Calvary Chapel in Chino, California, counter-cultist Kurt Van Gorden stated that Mormon men have the option of resurrecting their wives (or not resurrecting them), implying this could be used as a bargaining chip of sorts.

Source referenced in: Daniel C. Peterson, "Easier than Research, More Inflammatory than Truth", 2000 FAIR Conference address.