Difference between revisions of "Source:Plowman:Christianity Today:1977:Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{FME-Source\n\|title=(.*)\n\|category=(.*)\n}} +{{FairMormon}}))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source
+
{{FairMormon}}
|title=Edward E. Plowman, ''Christianity Today'': "Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory"
 
|category=Book of Mormon
 
}}
 
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
==Edward E. Plowman, ''Christianity Today'': "Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory"==
 
==Edward E. Plowman, ''Christianity Today'': "Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory"==

Revision as of 23:00, 27 June 2017

FAIR Answers—back to home page

Edward E. Plowman, Christianity Today: "Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory"

Edward E. Plowman:

...Mormon archivists have assembled a large amount of evidence -- some of it impressive -- to rebut the Spalding theory. They scored a coup of sorts when they discovered that a manuscript page from another Mormon book, Doctrine and Covenants, is apparently in the same handwriting as that of the Unidentified Scribe in the Book of Mormon manuscript. It is dated June, 1831 -- fifteen years after Spalding's death.... The average layman can readily note the striking dissimilarities between Spalding's specimens and the others....[1]


Notes

  1. Edward E. Plowman, Christianity Today (21 October 1977): 38-39).