Source:Livingstone:Journal of Semitic Studies:42:1:se'um

Revision as of 20:13, 25 September 2014 by RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{FME-Source |title=Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'" |category=Book of Mormon/Plants/Sheum }} <onlyinclude> ==Li...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"

Parent page: Book of Mormon/Plants/Sheum

Livingstone: "the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'"

If this [u'um] was the common word in Babylonian then it is more than likely that it also existed in Old Akkadian and could then have existed along with se, 'barley', as a loanword in Sumerian. ... In summary, the evidence allows but does not require the existence of a word se'um, 'barley'. It does, however, manifestly require the existence of a word u'um.​ [1]

Notes

  1. Alasdair Livingstone, "The Akkadian Word for Barley: A Note from the Schoolroom" (Journal of Semitic Studies, 42:1, Sp 1997)