Diferenças entre edições de "Pergunta: Foi Thomas Coleman (ou Colbourn) "sangue expiou"?"

(Criou a página com "{{fonte |título=Question: Was Thomas Coleman (or Colbourn) "blood atoned"? |categoria= }} <onlyinclude> {{translate}} ==Question: Was Thomas Coleman (or Colbourn) "blood at...")
 
Linha 15: Linha 15:
  
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
 +
[[de:Frage: War Thomas Coleman (oder Colbourn) "Blut gesühnt"?]]
 
[[en:Question: Was Thomas Coleman (or Colbourn) "blood atoned"?]]
 
[[en:Question: Was Thomas Coleman (or Colbourn) "blood atoned"?]]
[[pt:Pergunta: Foi Thomas Coleman (ou Colbourn) "sangue expiou"?]]
 

Revisão das 15h36min de 5 de junho de 2017

Índice

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


Question: Was Thomas Coleman (or Colbourn) "blood atoned"?

"Blood atonement" was supposedly applied to endowed Mormons who apostatized - Coleman was not an apostate and had not received his endowment

Thomas Coleman (referred to as "Colbourn" in some sources) was a black Mormon employed by Brigham Young at the Salt Lake House hotel. In 1866, Coleman was apparently discovered talking discreetly with a woman he was believed to be courting, and the men who discovered them together killed him and mutilated his body. A label was placed on his body: "Notice to all niggers! Leave white women alone!!!"[1] His death was purportedly covered up by an all-Mormon grand jury.

The difficulty here is that "blood atonement" was supposedly applied to endowed Mormons who apostatized. While Coleman may have been a Mormon, he definitely wasn't an endowed member, nor was he an apostate. Assuming the reported circumstances of his death are true, they are a tragic example of racism and lynching, one all too common in that time period.

Notas

  1. Union Vedette, (13 December 1866): page 3. A scan of the article is available here.