Mostrar código-fonte de Pergunta: Qual é a distinção entre a crença na "magia popular" e uma crença religiosa no sobrenatural?

{{fonte
|título=Question: What is the distinction between belief in "folk magic" and a religious belief in the supernatural?
|categoria=
}}
<onlyinclude>
{{translate}}
==Question: What is the distinction between belief in "folk magic" and a religious belief in the supernatural?==
===The use of the terms "magic" and "occult" are prejudicial, loaded terminology===

When critics use the term "magic" or "occult," they are using prejudicial, loaded terminology.  Used in a neutral sense, magic might mean only that a person believes in the supernatural, and believes that supernatural can be influenced for the believer's benefit.

However, critics are generally not clear about what definition of magic they are using, and how to distinguish a "magical" belief in the supernatural from a "religious" belief in the supernatural.<ref>See discussions of this issue in: {{FR-12-2-15}}; {{FR-12-2-16}}; {{FR-12-2-16}}</ref> Scholars of magic and religion have, in fact, come to realize that defining "magic" is probably a hopeless task.  John Gee noted:

===Defining "magic" as "religious beliefs other than their own"===

<blockquote>
In 1990, Cambridge University published Stanley Tambiah's Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality, which showed that the definitions of many of the most important writers on "magic" were heavily influenced both by their backgrounds and their personal ideological agendas: they defined "magic" as religious beliefs other than their own.  In 1992, the International Interdisciplinary Conference on Magic in the Ancient World failed to come to any agreement on what "magic" was. The plenary speaker, Jonathan Z. Smith, in particular voiced strong opinions:

<blockquote>
I see little merit in continuing the use of the substantive term "magic" in second-order, theoretical, academic discourse. We have better and more precise scholarly taxa for each of the phenomena commonly denoted by "magic" which, among other benefits, create more useful categories for comparison. For any culture I am familiar with, we can trade places between the corpus of materials conventionally labeled "magical" and corpora designated by other generic terms (e.g., healing, divining, execrative) with no cognitive loss. Indeed, there would be a gain.<ref>{{FR-12-2-15}}; citing Stanley J. Tambiah, ''Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality'' (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990) and Jonathan Z. Smith, "Trading Places," in ''Ancient Magic and Ritual Power'', ed. Marvin Meyer and Paul Mirecki (Leiden: Brill, 1995), 16.</ref>
</blockquote>
</blockquote> 

===The use of the term "magic" is a negative label for modern Christians===

The use of the term "magic" imposes, especially for modern Christians, a negative label at the outset, which explains its popularity for critics. As Professor of Egyptology Robert K. Ritner explained:

<blockquote>
Modern Western terms for 'magic' function primarily as designations for that which we as a society do not accept, and which has overtones of the supernatural or the demonic (but not of the divine). It is important to stress that this pejorative connotation has not been grafted onto the notion of magic as the result of any recent theoretical fancy but is inherent in Western terminology virtually from its beginning. It constitutes ''the essential core'' of the Western concept of magic.<ref>Robert K. Ritner, "Egyptian Magic: Questions of Legitimacy, Religious Orthodoxy and Social Deviance," in ''Studies in Pharaonic Religion and Society in Honour of J. Gwyn Griffiths'' , ed. Alan B. Lloyd (London: Egypt Exploration Society, 1992), 190; cited in {{FR-12-2-15}} {{eo}}.</ref>
</blockquote>

===The Book of Mormon condemns "magic"===

Moroni's visit was a turning point for Joseph, for it is important to note that the Book of Mormon itself condemns "magic" whenever it is mentioned:
<blockquote>
And it came to pass that there were sorceries, and witchcrafts, and magics; and the power of the evil one was wrought upon all the face of the land, even unto the fulfilling of all the words of Abinadi, and also Samuel the Lamanite. {{s||Mormon|1|19}}
</blockquote>

Regardless of Joseph's or his family's previous opinions regarding folk magic prior to the coming forth of the Book of Mormon, they clearly always believed in and had faith in God. Joseph believed that instruments such as the Urim and Thummim and his seer stone were consecrated by God for their intended use.
</onlyinclude>
{{notas}}

<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->

[[en:Question: What is the distinction between belief in "folk magic" and a religious belief in the supernatural?]]