Diferencia entre revisiones de «Pregunta: ¿El texto del Libro de Abraham fue recibido a través de la revelación?»

m (Bot: reemplazo automático de texto (-{{grammar}} +{{uncheck}}))
 
(No se muestra una edición intermedia del mismo usuario)
Línea 1: Línea 1:
 
{{FairMormon}}
 
{{FairMormon}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
{{H2
+
==Pregunta: ¿El texto del Libro de Abraham fue recibido a través de la revelación?==
|L={{check}}
+
{{translate}}
|H=Libro de Abraham como texto recibidos a través de la revelación
+
===This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham ''was not'' on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst===
|S=
 
|L1=
 
}}
 
{{uncheck}}
 
  
Esta teoría asume que el Libro de Abraham'' no era'' en los papiros; que recibió el texto por revelación, con la actuación papiros como catalizador. Esta es una posibilidad porque José usó la palabra "traducción" para significar varias cosas, entre ellas el proceso de recibir revelación pura. (Revelaciones de José Smith llaman su revisión de la Biblia una "traducción"([http://www.lds.org/scriptures/search?lang=eng&query=D%26C+73%3A4%3B+D%26C+76%3A15%3B+D%26C+90%3A13%3B+D%26C+94%3A10%3B+D%26C+124%3A89&x=0&y=0 D&C 73:4; 76:15; 90:13; 94:10; 124:89]), a pesar de que no hizo uso de ningún Hebrea de manuscritos griegos. También, {{s||DC|7|}} es una traducción revelada de un registro perdido escrito por el apóstol Juan.)
+
Did the papyri simply serve as a catalyst to prompt such a revelation?
 +
 
 +
This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham ''was not'' on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst. This is a possibility because Joseph used the word "translation" to mean several things, including the process of receiving pure revelation. (Joseph Smith's revelations call his revision of the Bible a "translation" ({{s||D&C|73|4}}; {{sv||D&C|76|15}}; {{sv||D&C|90|13}}; {{sv||D&C|94|10}}; {{sv||D&C|124|89}}), even though he didn't use any Hebrew of Greek manuscripts. Also, {{s||D&C|7|}} is a revealed translation of a lost record written by the Apostle John.)
 +
 
 +
</onlyinclude>
 +
{{notas finales}}
  
  
 
[[en:Question: Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?]]
 
[[en:Question: Was the text of the Book of Abraham received through revelation?]]

Revisión actual del 23:38 5 nov 2017

Tabla de Contenidos

Pregunta: ¿El texto del Libro de Abraham fue recibido a través de la revelación?

  NEEDS TRANSLATION  


This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham was not on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst

Did the papyri simply serve as a catalyst to prompt such a revelation?

This theory assumes that the Book of Abraham was not on the papyri; he received the text by revelation, with the papyri acting as a catalyst. This is a possibility because Joseph used the word "translation" to mean several things, including the process of receiving pure revelation. (Joseph Smith's revelations call his revision of the Bible a "translation" (D&C 73:4; Plantilla:Sv; Plantilla:Sv; Plantilla:Sv; Plantilla:Sv), even though he didn't use any Hebrew of Greek manuscripts. Also, D&C 7: is a revealed translation of a lost record written by the Apostle John.)


Notas