Difference between revisions of "Question: Do we have all of the papyri that Joseph Smith had?"

(Question: Do we have all of the papyrus that Joseph Smith had?)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FairMormon}}
+
#REDIRECT[[Production of the Book of Abraham#Do we have all of the papyri that Joseph Smith had?]]
<onlyinclude>
+
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
==Question: Do we have all of the papyri that Joseph Smith had?==
+
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Tenemos todo el papiro que tenía José Smith?]]
===There is no question that we are currently missing some papyri===
 
  
Even critics of the Book of Abraham must acknowledge this. For example, we are missing the originals to Facsimiles 2 and 3. The question therefore is: how much papyrus are we missing? Professor John Gee has estimated, based on historical eyewitness testimony, papyrilogical considerations, and mathematical calculations, that we're missing a sizable portion of the Joseph Smith Papyri. Professor Gee further argues the likelihood that the text of the Book of Abraham translated (again, via revelation, and not by scholarly means) by Joseph Smith was contained in this missing portion of papyri. <ref>John Gee, "Eyewitness, Hearsay, and Physical Evidence of the Joseph Smith Papyri," in The Disciple as Witness: Essays on Latter-day Saint History and Doctrine in Honor of Richard Lloyd Anderson, ed. Stephen D. Ricks, Donald W. Parry, and Andrew H. Hedges (Provo, Utah: FARMS, 2000), 175–218; "Some Puzzles from the Joseph Smith Papyri," 115–123; "Formulas and Faith," Journal of the Book of Mormon and Other Restoration Scripture 21, no. 1 (2012): 60–65; "Book of Abraham, I Presume," online at http://www.fairlds.org/fair-conferences/2012-fair-conference/2012-book-of-abraham-i-presume; See also http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Abraham/Size_of_missing_papyrus</ref>  Professor Gee is not without his critics, however, who argue instead that we're missing only a small portion of the original papyri. <ref>Andrew W. Cook and Christopher C. Smith, “The Original Length of the Scroll of Hôr,” Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 43, no. 4 (Winter 2010), 1–42; Andrew W. Cook, "Formulas and Facts: A Response to John Gee," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 45, no. 3 (Fall 2012): 1–10.</ref>
 
 
As such, this is still an open question. Further research is being conducted that will hopefully shed further light on this question. In the mean time, however, Professor Gee's so-called "Missing Papyrus Theory" cannot merely be dismissed. Those who struggle with the Book of Abraham controversy must deal with the evidence presented by Professor Gee.
 
</onlyinclude>
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
 
[[Category:John Dehlin's "Questions and Answers"]]
 
[[Category:John Dehlin's "Questions and Answers"]]
 
[[Category:Mormonism Unmasked]]
 
[[Category:Mormonism Unmasked]]
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 11:40, 20 May 2024