Difference between revisions of "Prophetic words as scripture"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{SummaryHeader\n\|link=(.*)\n\|subject=(.*)\n\|summary=(.*)\n\|sublink +{{H2\n|L=\1\n|H2=\2\n|S=\3\n|L))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|sublink +|L))
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|S=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
 
|S=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
 
|L1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
 
|L1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
|sublink2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
+
|L2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
 
}}
 
}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 02:03, 8 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"

Summary: Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.


Jump to details:


Notes