Difference between revisions of "Question: Is any book of scripture perfect?"

(Question: Is any book of scripture perfect?)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
[[en:Question: Is any book of scripture perfect?]]
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Hay algún libro de las Escrituras perfecto?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Qualquer um dos livros de escritura é perfeito?]]
 
 
 
 
[[Category:Mormon Stories' "Questions and Answers"]]
 
[[Category:Mormon Stories' "Questions and Answers"]]
 
[[Category:MormonThink]]
 
[[Category:MormonThink]]
 
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]]
 
[[Category:The Kingdom of the Cults]]
 
[[Category:Facts Mormons Won't Tell You]]
 
[[Category:Facts Mormons Won't Tell You]]
 +
 +
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Hay algún libro de las Escrituras perfecto?]]
 +
[[pt:Pergunta: Qualquer um dos livros de escritura é perfeito?]]

Revision as of 15:35, 5 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Question: Is any book of scripture perfect?

No book of scripture is "perfect"

Latter-day Saints do not subscribe to the conservative Protestant belief in scriptural inerrancy. We do not believe that any book of scripture is perfect or infallible. Brigham Young explained:

When God speaks to the people, he does it in a manner to suit their circumstances and capacities.... Should the Lord Almighty send an angel to re-write the Bible, it would in many places be very different from what it now is. And I will even venture to say that if the Book of Mormon were now to be re-written, in many instances it would materially differ from the present translation. According as people are willing to receive the things of God, so the heavens send forth their blessings.[1]

So while the Book of Mormon has come down to us with fewer doctrinal errors and corruptions than the Bible, even it could be improved if we were ready to receive further light and knowledge.

Infelicities of language are also to be expected when produced by revelators with little education, said George A. Smith:

The Book of Mormon was denounced as ungrammatical. An argument was raised that if it had been translated by the gift and power of God it would have been strictly grammatical.... When the Lord reveals anything to men, he reveals it in a language that corresponds with their own. If you were to converse with an angel, and you used strictly grammatical language he would do the same. But if you used two negatives in a sentence the heavenly messenger would use language to correspond with your understanding.[2]


Notes

  1. Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 9:311. [13 July 1862]
  2. George A. Smith, Journal of Discourses 12:335. [15 November 1863]