Difference between revisions of "Question: Why does Joseph Smith state in his 1832 First Vision account that he was in his "16th year" of age?"

 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{FME-Source
+
#REDIRECT[[Differences in First Vision accounts]]
|title=Question: Why does Joseph Smith state in his 1832 First Vision account that he was in his "16th year" of age?
+
<!--Leaving two spaces keeps elements from smushing against each other-->
|category=First Vision/Accounts
 
}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
==Question: Why does Joseph Smith state in his 1832 First Vision account that he was in his "16th year" of age?==
 
===The only account showing a different age is the 1832 account, which states age 15 rather than 14===
 
 
 
In the 1832 account, Frederick G. Williams inserted the "in the 16th year of my age" above Joseph's text ''after'' Joseph had already written it. (See: [http://josephsmithpapers.org/paperSummary/history-circa-summer-1832?dm=image-and-text&zm=zoom-inner&tm=expanded&p=3&s=undefined&sm=none "History, circa Summer 1832,"] ''The Joseph Smith Papers'')
 
[[File:1832.account.16th.year.png|800px|thumb|center]]
 
 
 
===Joseph's 1832 account states the "16th year" of his age in the handwriting of Frederick G. Williams===
 
 
 
In Joseph Smith's 1832 First Vision recital he said that he was "in the 16th year of [his] age" when the manifestation took place but in all other accounts in which he mentions his age, he was in his "fifteenth year."
 
*Is this evidence that the Prophet's story evolved over time, and was thus a fabrication to begin with?
 
 
 
The only First Vision account that provided a different age was the 1832 account written in Joseph Smith's own handwriting. In 1832, 12 years ''after'' the First Vision, Joseph wrote, "we were deprived of the bennifit of an education suffice it to say I was mearly instructid in reading and writing and the ground rules of Arithmatic which constuted my whole literary acquirements."
 
 
 
===There is nothing nefarious in Joseph Smith correcting his own slight mathematical miscalculations===
 
 
 
Although the portion of Joseph's 1832 history is in his own handwriting, the text insertion of "in the 16th year of my age" was in the handwriting of Frederick G. Williams, Joseph's scribe. It is likely that Joseph's dating schemes were slightly off when he dictated his age to Williams, many years after-the-fact. There is nothing nefarious in Joseph Smith correcting his own slight mathematical miscalculations.
 
 
 
Two years later, Oliver Cowdery had Joseph's 1832 history in his possession when he began publishing history of the Church in late 1834 in the ''Latter-day Saints' Messenger and Advocate''. Oliver clearly established Joseph's age as 14 ("the 15th year of his life") during the period of religious excitement (although Oliver ultimately [[Joseph Smith's First Vision/Accounts/Oliver Cowdery not aware of First Vision in 1834-35|never described the actual First Vision at this time]]). Once the date of the First Vision was correctly established it remained steady throughout all subsequent recitals as the "15th year" or "age 14."
 
</onlyinclude>
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
 
[[Category:Becoming Gods]]
 
[[Category:Becoming Gods]]
 
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
 
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]
Line 33: Line 10:
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué dice José Smith en su Primera Visión relato de 1832 de que él estaba en su "año 16a" de la edad?]]
 
[[es:Pregunta: ¿Por qué dice José Smith en su Primera Visión relato de 1832 de que él estaba en su "año 16a" de la edad?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph Smith diz em sua 1832 Primeira Visão relato que eu estava em seu "16 anos" de idade?]]
 
[[pt:Pergunta: Por que Joseph Smith diz em sua 1832 Primeira Visão relato que eu estava em seu "16 anos" de idade?]]
 +
[[Category:Questions]]

Latest revision as of 02:41, 17 May 2024